<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 167 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48579</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the order requiring deposit of duty and interest in a case involving the interpretation of duty exemption for Turnkey Projects. The petitioner successfully argued that the fire heater, considered an integral part of the project, should not be subject to tax. As a result, the Court allowed the respondent to appeal without pre-deposit of duty and interest, making the Rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 167 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48579</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the order requiring deposit of duty and interest in a case involving the interpretation of duty exemption for Turnkey Projects. The petitioner successfully argued that the fire heater, considered an integral part of the project, should not be subject to tax. As a result, the Court allowed the respondent to appeal without pre-deposit of duty and interest, making the Rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>