<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 205 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48577</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a communication by the 3rd respondent regarding the import of non-flyable air crafts for educational purposes. The court upheld the provisional assessment completed by the respondents, requiring the petitioner to execute a bond and furnish a bank guarantee. Despite the petitioner&#039;s argument of exorbitant valuation, the court found no grounds to interfere, noting discrepancies in the declared value compared to previous imports. The court concluded that the respondents were justified in securing their interests, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:45:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 205 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48577</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a communication by the 3rd respondent regarding the import of non-flyable air crafts for educational purposes. The court upheld the provisional assessment completed by the respondents, requiring the petitioner to execute a bond and furnish a bank guarantee. Despite the petitioner&#039;s argument of exorbitant valuation, the court found no grounds to interfere, noting discrepancies in the declared value compared to previous imports. The court concluded that the respondents were justified in securing their interests, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>