<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 686 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783146</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s tax appeal and affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s order granting refund to the assessee. It held that the services were rendered and consumed outside India, beyond the territorial jurisdiction for levy of service tax, and the amount deposited without authority of law could not be treated as service tax. The HC accepted the Tribunal&#039;s finding of violation of principles of natural justice, as the lower authorities had ignored binding precedents cited by the assessee and failed to distinguish them. Concluding that no substantial question of law arose, HC upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to refund and rejected the revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 08:42:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 686 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783146</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s tax appeal and affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s order granting refund to the assessee. It held that the services were rendered and consumed outside India, beyond the territorial jurisdiction for levy of service tax, and the amount deposited without authority of law could not be treated as service tax. The HC accepted the Tribunal&#039;s finding of violation of principles of natural justice, as the lower authorities had ignored binding precedents cited by the assessee and failed to distinguish them. Concluding that no substantial question of law arose, HC upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to refund and rejected the revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>