<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 271 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48562</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the findings that the revenue failed to prove the seized goods were smuggled and were freely available in the market. The Court declined to interfere with the established findings of fact by the lower authorities and dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law arose for determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:26:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 271 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48562</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the findings that the revenue failed to prove the seized goods were smuggled and were freely available in the market. The Court declined to interfere with the established findings of fact by the lower authorities and dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law arose for determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>