<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 702 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783162</link>
    <description>HC held that the ex-parte adjudication order passed under Section 63 of the GST Act was vitiated by violation of principles of natural justice. The authority failed to ensure proper service of the SCN on the petitioner, who had become an unregistered person under the GST regime, resulting in deprivation of opportunity to be heard and to produce relevant material. The HC set aside the adjudication order dated 03.02.2022 and directed the petitioner to appear before the competent authority by a specified date. The authority was directed to conduct fresh adjudication, permitting the petitioner to file objections, explanations and raise all legally available contentions. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 14:38:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 702 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783162</link>
      <description>HC held that the ex-parte adjudication order passed under Section 63 of the GST Act was vitiated by violation of principles of natural justice. The authority failed to ensure proper service of the SCN on the petitioner, who had become an unregistered person under the GST regime, resulting in deprivation of opportunity to be heard and to produce relevant material. The HC set aside the adjudication order dated 03.02.2022 and directed the petitioner to appear before the competent authority by a specified date. The authority was directed to conduct fresh adjudication, permitting the petitioner to file objections, explanations and raise all legally available contentions. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>