https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465183 A banking dispute arising from fixed deposit receipts was treated as a commercial dispute because the plaint disclosed a commercial banking arrangement within Section 2(c)(i) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; the defendant's plea of adjustment against an alleged demand loan did not change that character. Objection to mis-joinder was addressed by permitting deletion of defendant Nos. 2 to 6, as they were conceded not to be necessary or proper parties, and the party title was directed to be corrected accordingly. The suit therefore remained maintainable as a commercial suit and proceeded against the remaining parties. en-us Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Dec 2025 16:44:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465183 A banking dispute arising from fixed deposit receipts was treated as a commercial dispute because the plaint disclosed a commercial banking arrangement within Section 2(c)(i) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; the defendant's plea of adjustment against an alleged demand loan did not change that character. Objection to mis-joinder was addressed by permitting deletion of defendant Nos. 2 to 6, as they were conceded not to be necessary or proper parties, and the party title was directed to be corrected accordingly. The suit therefore remained maintainable as a commercial suit and proceeded against the remaining parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465183