<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 645 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783105</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the applicant&#039;s bail plea under Section 483 BNSS r/w Section 45 PMLA, holding that stringent twin conditions under PMLA were not satisfied. The Court found a strong prima facie case of money laundering and scheduled offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, noting that bank accounts, including those of shell entities and APMC-linked accounts, constituted &quot;property&quot; used for laundering illicit funds. The applicant and co-accused wrongfully controlled victims&#039; bank accounts, filled in blank cheques as unauthorized payees, and derived wrongful gain. Given the gravity of the offence, risk of tampering with evidence, and likelihood of reoffending, the applicant was denied bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 08:41:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 645 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783105</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the applicant&#039;s bail plea under Section 483 BNSS r/w Section 45 PMLA, holding that stringent twin conditions under PMLA were not satisfied. The Court found a strong prima facie case of money laundering and scheduled offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, noting that bank accounts, including those of shell entities and APMC-linked accounts, constituted &quot;property&quot; used for laundering illicit funds. The applicant and co-accused wrongfully controlled victims&#039; bank accounts, filled in blank cheques as unauthorized payees, and derived wrongful gain. Given the gravity of the offence, risk of tampering with evidence, and likelihood of reoffending, the applicant was denied bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>