<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 665 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783125</link>
    <description>ITAT partly allowed assessee&#039;s appeal and upheld CIT(A)&#039;s relief on key issues. It held that a separate TP benchmarking for royalty was impermissible when TNMM was accepted for other international transactions; the assessee&#039;s TNMM-based ALP for royalty was directed to be accepted. Exemption u/s 10AA was sustained, holding that for A.Y. 2018-19 timely filing u/s 139(1) was not a mandatory condition and the marginal delay due to portal glitches could not defeat the claim. Deduction u/s 80JJAA, disallowed by CPC for delayed return, was also allowed. Disallowance u/s 14A as made by AO was upheld, but its addition to book profit u/s 115JB was disallowed. Issues on s.35(2AB), double taxation of LTCG and interest u/s 234C were remanded to AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 665 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783125</link>
      <description>ITAT partly allowed assessee&#039;s appeal and upheld CIT(A)&#039;s relief on key issues. It held that a separate TP benchmarking for royalty was impermissible when TNMM was accepted for other international transactions; the assessee&#039;s TNMM-based ALP for royalty was directed to be accepted. Exemption u/s 10AA was sustained, holding that for A.Y. 2018-19 timely filing u/s 139(1) was not a mandatory condition and the marginal delay due to portal glitches could not defeat the claim. Deduction u/s 80JJAA, disallowed by CPC for delayed return, was also allowed. Disallowance u/s 14A as made by AO was upheld, but its addition to book profit u/s 115JB was disallowed. Issues on s.35(2AB), double taxation of LTCG and interest u/s 234C were remanded to AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>