https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=64171 Karthi Chidambaram challenges confirmation of a provisional attachment of his properties worth Rs 1.16 crore in the Aircel-Maxis PMLA investigation, arguing that when the confirmation order was passed no prosecution complaint had been filed against him, no proceedings under the PMLA were pending, the statutory limitation condition remained unsatisfied, and consequently the provisional attachment had lapsed such that subsequent filing of a prosecution complaint could not validate the prior confirmation. en-us Tue, 09 Dec 2025 22:46:03 +0530 Tue, 09 Dec 2025 22:46:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=64171 Karthi Chidambaram challenges confirmation of a provisional attachment of his properties worth Rs 1.16 crore in the Aircel-Maxis PMLA investigation, arguing that when the confirmation order was passed no prosecution complaint had been filed against him, no proceedings under the PMLA were pending, the statutory limitation condition remained unsatisfied, and consequently the provisional attachment had lapsed such that subsequent filing of a prosecution complaint could not validate the prior confirmation. News - Tue, 09 Dec 2025 22:46:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=64171