<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 269 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48552</link>
    <description>A public interest writ seeking a mandamus for investigation into alleged tax evasion, undervaluation and foreign exchange loss is described as unsustainable where it rests only on unverified departmental communications. The text states that prior audit and departmental scrutiny had already examined the allegations and found no prima facie undervaluation, revenue loss or foreign exchange loss. It also notes that PIL jurisdiction should not be used for roving enquiries or vexatious, publicity-oriented litigation, and that the Court must be satisfied about the petitioner&#039;s bona fides and the seriousness of the material placed before it. On that basis, the relief is stated to have been declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 269 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48552</link>
      <description>A public interest writ seeking a mandamus for investigation into alleged tax evasion, undervaluation and foreign exchange loss is described as unsustainable where it rests only on unverified departmental communications. The text states that prior audit and departmental scrutiny had already examined the allegations and found no prima facie undervaluation, revenue loss or foreign exchange loss. It also notes that PIL jurisdiction should not be used for roving enquiries or vexatious, publicity-oriented litigation, and that the Court must be satisfied about the petitioner&#039;s bona fides and the seriousness of the material placed before it. On that basis, the relief is stated to have been declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>