<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NAAC accreditation processes long, bureaucratic and cumbersome: Parliamentary panel</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=64152</link>
    <description>The parliamentary committee found NAAC&#039;s accreditation process long and bureaucratic, recommending streamlined procedures, consideration of a binary accreditation model to reduce discretion, and an internal investigation into alleged bribery with findings to be shared. It urged urgent steps to restore NAAC&#039;s credibility despite recent grading revisions and removal of peer assessors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 19:31:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 19:31:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NAAC accreditation processes long, bureaucratic and cumbersome: Parliamentary panel</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=64152</link>
      <description>The parliamentary committee found NAAC&#039;s accreditation process long and bureaucratic, recommending streamlined procedures, consideration of a binary accreditation model to reduce discretion, and an internal investigation into alleged bribery with findings to be shared. It urged urgent steps to restore NAAC&#039;s credibility despite recent grading revisions and removal of peer assessors.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 19:31:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=64152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>