<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 110 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48541</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to register the contracts and return the bank guarantee. It clarified that REP licences are valid for concessional customs duty under Tariff Heading 98.01 if contracts are registered and imports comply with the Import Policy. The court emphasized interpreting regulations to facilitate trade activities without unnecessary restrictions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2014 20:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 110 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48541</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to register the contracts and return the bank guarantee. It clarified that REP licences are valid for concessional customs duty under Tariff Heading 98.01 if contracts are registered and imports comply with the Import Policy. The court emphasized interpreting regulations to facilitate trade activities without unnecessary restrictions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>