<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48539</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) disallowing discounts and expenses, directing a reconsideration of the stay application in accordance with the law. The Court found the Commissioner&#039;s approach unjustified as he did not consider the petitioner&#039;s pleas and was influenced by the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s findings. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:27:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48539</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) disallowing discounts and expenses, directing a reconsideration of the stay application in accordance with the law. The Court found the Commissioner&#039;s approach unjustified as he did not consider the petitioner&#039;s pleas and was influenced by the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s findings. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>