<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 226 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48536</link>
    <description>A revision filed only by the accused could not be used to convert the conviction into the graver form under the Customs Act where the State had not challenged the appellate court&#039;s mistaken treatment of the offence. The evidence showed concealment of gold biscuits and US dollars without disclosure or payment of duty, but the conviction was retained only under the lesser clause. The Court also treated the accused&#039;s financial hardship, his wife&#039;s medical condition, family responsibility, the lapse of time, and prior preventive detention as special circumstances warranting reduction of sentence. The punishment was therefore softened to a fine with a default term of simple imprisonment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 226 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48536</link>
      <description>A revision filed only by the accused could not be used to convert the conviction into the graver form under the Customs Act where the State had not challenged the appellate court&#039;s mistaken treatment of the offence. The evidence showed concealment of gold biscuits and US dollars without disclosure or payment of duty, but the conviction was retained only under the lesser clause. The Court also treated the accused&#039;s financial hardship, his wife&#039;s medical condition, family responsibility, the lapse of time, and prior preventive detention as special circumstances warranting reduction of sentence. The punishment was therefore softened to a fine with a default term of simple imprisonment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>