https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783102 SC, exercising review jurisdiction, dismissed the taxpayer's petition seeking reconsideration of its earlier order refusing interference under Article 136 in a dispute concerning refund of unutilized input tax credit under GST law. The Court held that no error apparent on the face of the record or any other ground warranting review was demonstrated. Reiterating the limited scope of review under constitutional and procedural principles, SC concluded that the earlier refusal to interfere with the underlying refund determination did not suffer from any perversity, patent illegality, or miscarriage of justice. Consequently, the prior order dated 28.03.2025 attained finality and the review petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Dec 2025 08:42:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783102 SC, exercising review jurisdiction, dismissed the taxpayer's petition seeking reconsideration of its earlier order refusing interference under Article 136 in a dispute concerning refund of unutilized input tax credit under GST law. The Court held that no error apparent on the face of the record or any other ground warranting review was demonstrated. Reiterating the limited scope of review under constitutional and procedural principles, SC concluded that the earlier refusal to interfere with the underlying refund determination did not suffer from any perversity, patent illegality, or miscarriage of justice. Consequently, the prior order dated 28.03.2025 attained finality and the review petition was dismissed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783102