<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax exemption under s.11 restored; receipts within s.2(15) limit, membership fees not treated as commercial income</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94877</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee-society and restored exemption under s.11. It held that the society is engaged in advancement of general public utility and its event-based receipts, being less than 20% of its gross receipts, fall within the tolerance limit under the proviso to s.2(15). Membership fees from associated, student and charter members were held not to be consideration for trade, commerce or business. The AO&#039;s conclusion that 48% of income was commercial and that a 22% surplus negated charitable character was rejected, relying on SC precedent. ITAT further found Form 10 had been duly filed, invalidating CIT(A)&#039;s contrary ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 08:41:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 08:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax exemption under s.11 restored; receipts within s.2(15) limit, membership fees not treated as commercial income</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94877</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee-society and restored exemption under s.11. It held that the society is engaged in advancement of general public utility and its event-based receipts, being less than 20% of its gross receipts, fall within the tolerance limit under the proviso to s.2(15). Membership fees from associated, student and charter members were held not to be consideration for trade, commerce or business. The AO&#039;s conclusion that 48% of income was commercial and that a 22% surplus negated charitable character was rejected, relying on SC precedent. ITAT further found Form 10 had been duly filed, invalidating CIT(A)&#039;s contrary ground.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 08:41:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>