<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 576 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783036</link>
    <description>Maintainability of a petition challenging delayed adjudication of a show-cause notice and alleged breach of natural justice was deferred in light of a Supreme Court order. Because the impugned order was appealable, the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the available statutory alternative remedy, and the petition was disposed of without substantive consideration of those issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 08:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 576 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783036</link>
      <description>Maintainability of a petition challenging delayed adjudication of a show-cause notice and alleged breach of natural justice was deferred in light of a Supreme Court order. Because the impugned order was appealable, the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the available statutory alternative remedy, and the petition was disposed of without substantive consideration of those issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>