<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 576 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783036</link>
    <description>Maintainability of a writ petition was discussed in the context of delay in adjudication of a show cause notice and alleged violation of natural justice. The note records that, in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s order in Union of India v GMR Airport Infrastructure Ltd., consideration of such issues was deferred. It further notes that, as the impugned order had become appealable, the petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue the alternate statutory remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 08:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 576 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783036</link>
      <description>Maintainability of a writ petition was discussed in the context of delay in adjudication of a show cause notice and alleged violation of natural justice. The note records that, in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s order in Union of India v GMR Airport Infrastructure Ltd., consideration of such issues was deferred. It further notes that, as the impugned order had become appealable, the petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue the alternate statutory remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>