<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 599 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783059</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order granting full relief to the assessee-society registered u/s 12AA. The Tribunal held that donations and charity were in line with the assessee&#039;s objects, advertisement and service payments to a related concern, royalty for brand use, and depreciation on branding and curriculum development were all incurred wholly for charitable purposes, with no material showing excessiveness or violation of s.13(1)(c) or 13(3). Ad hoc disallowances of various administrative and hostel-related expenses were rejected as arbitrary and unsupported by evidence. The AO&#039;s treatment of the assessee as an AOP was disapproved, and exemption/application of income u/ss 11 and 12 was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 08:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 599 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783059</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order granting full relief to the assessee-society registered u/s 12AA. The Tribunal held that donations and charity were in line with the assessee&#039;s objects, advertisement and service payments to a related concern, royalty for brand use, and depreciation on branding and curriculum development were all incurred wholly for charitable purposes, with no material showing excessiveness or violation of s.13(1)(c) or 13(3). Ad hoc disallowances of various administrative and hostel-related expenses were rejected as arbitrary and unsupported by evidence. The AO&#039;s treatment of the assessee as an AOP was disapproved, and exemption/application of income u/ss 11 and 12 was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>