https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465144 SC dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the HC's refusal to exercise writ jurisdiction. The Court held that the dispute over whether the petitioner's resignation, once accepted, precluded a subsequent termination, and the consequential claims regarding early retirement benefits and stock options, arose purely from a contractual relationship with a private bank. No public law element was involved merely because approval under section 35B(1)(b) had been questioned. The petitioner was left to pursue appropriate contractual remedies before the competent forum. en-us Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Dec 2025 18:58:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465144 SC dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the HC's refusal to exercise writ jurisdiction. The Court held that the dispute over whether the petitioner's resignation, once accepted, precluded a subsequent termination, and the consequential claims regarding early retirement benefits and stock options, arose purely from a contractual relationship with a private bank. No public law element was involved merely because approval under section 35B(1)(b) had been questioned. The petitioner was left to pursue appropriate contractual remedies before the competent forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465144