https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465147 Maintainability of the revenue's appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act against an order made under Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules was raised as a preliminary objection and had to be decided before any merits review. Because compliance with the Tribunal's direction would have rendered the appeal infructuous, interim protection was warranted pending that determination. The appeal was directed to be listed for hearing on the preliminary objection, and the Tribunal's order and direction dated 4 July 2025 were stayed in the meantime. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Dec 2025 18:58:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465147 Maintainability of the revenue's appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act against an order made under Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules was raised as a preliminary objection and had to be decided before any merits review. Because compliance with the Tribunal's direction would have rendered the appeal infructuous, interim protection was warranted pending that determination. The appeal was directed to be listed for hearing on the preliminary objection, and the Tribunal's order and direction dated 4 July 2025 were stayed in the meantime. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465147