<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CLAT Exam Analysis 2026 By Karan Mehta, Co-Founder – LegalEdge By Toprankers</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=64006</link>
    <description>CLAT 2026 was broadly balanced with most sections easy-to-moderate; the key change was a shift in Logical Reasoning toward Analytical Reasoning puzzles and data-arrangement sets, increasing time requirements and score variability. Legal Reasoning consisted of principle-based questions and a few direct legal-knowledge prompts on same-sex marriage and governance, remaining within expected scope and rewarding strong doctrinal fundamentals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 18:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 18:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CLAT Exam Analysis 2026 By Karan Mehta, Co-Founder – LegalEdge By Toprankers</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=64006</link>
      <description>CLAT 2026 was broadly balanced with most sections easy-to-moderate; the key change was a shift in Logical Reasoning toward Analytical Reasoning puzzles and data-arrangement sets, increasing time requirements and score variability. Legal Reasoning consisted of principle-based questions and a few direct legal-knowledge prompts on same-sex marriage and governance, remaining within expected scope and rewarding strong doctrinal fundamentals.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 18:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=64006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>