https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465142 Continuous supply transactions supported territorial jurisdiction in Delhi because the orders were received there, goods were supplied from Delhi through transport carriers, and delivery to the carrier was treated as delivery to the consignee. The account was treated as a running account rather than a mutual account, since the payments were made towards an outstanding trading balance and did not create independent reciprocal obligations; the last payment extended limitation and the suit was within time. Account books, bill-wise supplies and C-Forms proved the principal outstanding, and interest was allowed at the contractual rate of 18% per annum. en-us Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Dec 2025 17:28:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465142 Continuous supply transactions supported territorial jurisdiction in Delhi because the orders were received there, goods were supplied from Delhi through transport carriers, and delivery to the carrier was treated as delivery to the consignee. The account was treated as a running account rather than a mutual account, since the payments were made towards an outstanding trading balance and did not create independent reciprocal obligations; the last payment extended limitation and the suit was within time. Account books, bill-wise supplies and C-Forms proved the principal outstanding, and interest was allowed at the contractual rate of 18% per annum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465142