<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 159 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48509</link>
    <description>The High Court of Judicature at Bombay upheld the finding on the invocation of the extended period of limitation. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty under Section 11AC was set aside, and the original penalty orders were restored, requiring the penalty to be equal to the amount of duty when duty evasion is upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:24:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 159 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48509</link>
      <description>The High Court of Judicature at Bombay upheld the finding on the invocation of the extended period of limitation. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty under Section 11AC was set aside, and the original penalty orders were restored, requiring the penalty to be equal to the amount of duty when duty evasion is upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>