<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 649 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465141</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal by a non-speaking order, stating only &quot;Appeal dismissed,&quot; thereby affirming the judgment of the lower forum without modification. No reasons or legal analysis were provided, and no specific questions of law were adjudicated. The dismissal thus operates solely as an affirmance inter partes, without creating a binding precedent or clarifying any substantive or procedural legal principle beyond upholding the impugned decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 16:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 649 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465141</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal by a non-speaking order, stating only &quot;Appeal dismissed,&quot; thereby affirming the judgment of the lower forum without modification. No reasons or legal analysis were provided, and no specific questions of law were adjudicated. The dismissal thus operates solely as an affirmance inter partes, without creating a binding precedent or clarifying any substantive or procedural legal principle beyond upholding the impugned decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>