https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48498 A belated writ petition seeking enforcement of a redemption order and a direction to provide equivalent gold was rejected because the petitioner approached the authorities and the HC after an unexplained delay, by which time the confiscated gold had already been sold. The court treated the delay and laches as fatal to discretionary relief and held that the claim for implementation of the redemption option did not merit interference. en-us Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:03:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48498 A belated writ petition seeking enforcement of a redemption order and a direction to provide equivalent gold was rejected because the petitioner approached the authorities and the HC after an unexplained delay, by which time the confiscated gold had already been sold. The court treated the delay and laches as fatal to discretionary relief and held that the claim for implementation of the redemption option did not merit interference. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48498