<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Quicklime with CaO below 98 percent rightly classified under 2522 1000, not 2825 9090, per HSN Notes</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94852</link>
    <description>The CESTAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and set aside the impugned orders on classification of imported PCC Lime 0/20MM (Quicklime). Applying its own prior ruling in the same assessee&#039;s case and following precedent from another Bench, the Tribunal held that Quicklime with calcium oxide purity below 98% is excluded from Ch. 28 as per the HSN Explanatory Notes. Since test reports showed CaO content below 98%, classification under sub-heading 2825 9090 was held unsustainable. The goods were held correctly classifiable under sub-heading 2522 1000, as declared by the assessee, and Revenue&#039;s reclassification was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 08:31:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 08:31:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Quicklime with CaO below 98 percent rightly classified under 2522 1000, not 2825 9090, per HSN Notes</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94852</link>
      <description>The CESTAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and set aside the impugned orders on classification of imported PCC Lime 0/20MM (Quicklime). Applying its own prior ruling in the same assessee&#039;s case and following precedent from another Bench, the Tribunal held that Quicklime with calcium oxide purity below 98% is excluded from Ch. 28 as per the HSN Explanatory Notes. Since test reports showed CaO content below 98%, classification under sub-heading 2825 9090 was held unsustainable. The goods were held correctly classifiable under sub-heading 2522 1000, as declared by the assessee, and Revenue&#039;s reclassification was rejected.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 08:31:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>