<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 508 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782968</link>
    <description>In construing sales tax exemption entries, goods must be classified by their ordinary commercial meaning, and the word &quot;fresh&quot; must be given effect. Pineapple slices, pineapple tidbits, fruit cocktail preserved in sugar syrup, and canned fruit in vacuum-sealed containers are processed products with a commercial identity different from fruits in their natural and perishable state. They therefore do not qualify as &quot;fresh fruits&quot; within Entry A-23 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and are not exempt from tax on that basis. The reference was answered against the assessee and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary classification was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 08:31:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 508 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782968</link>
      <description>In construing sales tax exemption entries, goods must be classified by their ordinary commercial meaning, and the word &quot;fresh&quot; must be given effect. Pineapple slices, pineapple tidbits, fruit cocktail preserved in sugar syrup, and canned fruit in vacuum-sealed containers are processed products with a commercial identity different from fruits in their natural and perishable state. They therefore do not qualify as &quot;fresh fruits&quot; within Entry A-23 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and are not exempt from tax on that basis. The reference was answered against the assessee and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary classification was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>