<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 542 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783002</link>
    <description>A cash credit cannot be taxed under section 68 unless it pertains to the relevant previous year, and an opening balance carried forward from earlier years is not a fresh credit in the year under review. On the facts, the carried-forward amount was deleted because it had already been reflected in earlier years and had not arisen again in the assessment year. Where the assessee produced loan confirmations, income-tax acknowledgements and bank statements of the lenders, those documents discharged the initial burden of proving identity, creditworthiness and genuineness, and the addition was deleted because no independent adverse material was brought to rebut them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 08:31:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 542 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783002</link>
      <description>A cash credit cannot be taxed under section 68 unless it pertains to the relevant previous year, and an opening balance carried forward from earlier years is not a fresh credit in the year under review. On the facts, the carried-forward amount was deleted because it had already been reflected in earlier years and had not arisen again in the assessment year. Where the assessee produced loan confirmations, income-tax acknowledgements and bank statements of the lenders, those documents discharged the initial burden of proving identity, creditworthiness and genuineness, and the addition was deleted because no independent adverse material was brought to rebut them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>