<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 549 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783009</link>
    <description>HC held that there was no violation of principles of natural justice in cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s GST registration, as a show cause notice had been issued and opportunity of hearing afforded. However, considering that the petitioner sought to re-enter the tax regime and that revenue would benefit from regular compliance, the HC set aside the cancellation and appellate orders. The petitioner was directed to file all pending GST returns, particularly for the cancellation period, whereupon the authority shall consider revocation of registration. As a consequence of the petitioner&#039;s default, HC imposed costs of Rs. 50,000/- payable to the department within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 08:31:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 549 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783009</link>
      <description>HC held that there was no violation of principles of natural justice in cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s GST registration, as a show cause notice had been issued and opportunity of hearing afforded. However, considering that the petitioner sought to re-enter the tax regime and that revenue would benefit from regular compliance, the HC set aside the cancellation and appellate orders. The petitioner was directed to file all pending GST returns, particularly for the cancellation period, whereupon the authority shall consider revocation of registration. As a consequence of the petitioner&#039;s default, HC imposed costs of Rs. 50,000/- payable to the department within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>