<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 132 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48483</link>
    <description>The court upheld the penalties imposed on the appellant for diverting imported goods in contravention of statutory conditions, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s knowledge of confiscability and conscious involvement in the diversion. The judgment highlights the importance of complying with statutory requirements for availing duty concessions and the liability of agents involved in such violations under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 132 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48483</link>
      <description>The court upheld the penalties imposed on the appellant for diverting imported goods in contravention of statutory conditions, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s knowledge of confiscability and conscious involvement in the diversion. The judgment highlights the importance of complying with statutory requirements for availing duty concessions and the liability of agents involved in such violations under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>