<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 395 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48482</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the orders directing pre-deposit and dismissing the appeal by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata. The Tribunal failed to adequately consider the petitioner&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit due to financial hardship, leading to the quashing of the orders. The High Court instructed the Tribunal to reevaluate the stay application, ensuring a fair hearing for both parties and emphasizing the need to consider all relevant factual aspects, particularly financial difficulties faced by the petitioner. The writ petition was allowed without costs, highlighting the importance of proper consideration of financial hardship in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:58:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 395 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48482</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the orders directing pre-deposit and dismissing the appeal by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata. The Tribunal failed to adequately consider the petitioner&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit due to financial hardship, leading to the quashing of the orders. The High Court instructed the Tribunal to reevaluate the stay application, ensuring a fair hearing for both parties and emphasizing the need to consider all relevant factual aspects, particularly financial difficulties faced by the petitioner. The writ petition was allowed without costs, highlighting the importance of proper consideration of financial hardship in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>