https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48480 The appeal challenged the confiscation of seized gold under the Customs Act, 1962, arguing that it should have been considered 'dutiable goods' and redemption allowed under Section 125(1). The adjudicating authority was criticized for not considering the option of release upon payment of a fine. The High Court emphasized the authority's discretion in allowing redemption of confiscated goods and remitted the matter back for further consideration within a specified timeline. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Oct 2018 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48480 The appeal challenged the confiscation of seized gold under the Customs Act, 1962, arguing that it should have been considered 'dutiable goods' and redemption allowed under Section 125(1). The adjudicating authority was criticized for not considering the option of release upon payment of a fine. The High Court emphasized the authority's discretion in allowing redemption of confiscated goods and remitted the matter back for further consideration within a specified timeline. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48480