https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782967 SC dismissed the review petition challenging its earlier order affirming CESTAT's decision setting aside show cause notices issued to an importer. CESTAT had held that the foundational allegation of "suppression" by the importer, invoked to justify the notices and extended limitation, was not established by the revenue authorities. In review, SC found no error apparent on the face of the record and no legal or factual infirmity warranting reconsideration of its prior order. Consequently, the earlier decision stood undisturbed and the review petition was rejected. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:47:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782967 SC dismissed the review petition challenging its earlier order affirming CESTAT's decision setting aside show cause notices issued to an importer. CESTAT had held that the foundational allegation of "suppression" by the importer, invoked to justify the notices and extended limitation, was not established by the revenue authorities. In review, SC found no error apparent on the face of the record and no legal or factual infirmity warranting reconsideration of its prior order. Consequently, the earlier decision stood undisturbed and the review petition was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782967