<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment under section 147 upheld; retrospective withdrawal of Bioved approval triggers denial of section 35(1)(ii) deduction</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94817</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the validity of reassessment initiated under section 147, holding that subsequent CBDT Notification No. 3/2019 withdrawing approval of the donee institution, Bioved Research Society, with retrospective effect constituted fresh, tangible material indicating misuse of section 35(1)(ii) through accommodation entries. The AO&#039;s formation of belief that income had escaped assessment was found to be neither imaginary nor based on change of opinion. Consequently, the Tribunal sustained the disallowance of the assessee&#039;s Rs. 30 lakh donation and denial of deduction under section 35(1)(ii), deciding the appeal against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment under section 147 upheld; retrospective withdrawal of Bioved approval triggers denial of section 35(1)(ii) deduction</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94817</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the validity of reassessment initiated under section 147, holding that subsequent CBDT Notification No. 3/2019 withdrawing approval of the donee institution, Bioved Research Society, with retrospective effect constituted fresh, tangible material indicating misuse of section 35(1)(ii) through accommodation entries. The AO&#039;s formation of belief that income had escaped assessment was found to be neither imaginary nor based on change of opinion. Consequently, the Tribunal sustained the disallowance of the assessee&#039;s Rs. 30 lakh donation and denial of deduction under section 35(1)(ii), deciding the appeal against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>