<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxation under Section 44BB upheld over Section 9(1)(vii) r.w.s. 44DA; 2% offshore profit attribution accepted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94813</link>
    <description>ITAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding taxation of the assessee&#039;s receipts under Section 44BB rather than as FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) r.w.s. 44DA, following judicial consistency with earlier years in the assessee&#039;s own case. On offshore sale of equipment, ITAT accepted the assessee&#039;s 2% profit attribution for Indian operations, relying on prior coordinate bench findings that the assessee&#039;s selected comparables satisfied FAR analysis and yielded a weighted average margin of 1.69%. Consequently, no further profit attribution was warranted and AO was directed to accept the 2% margin.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxation under Section 44BB upheld over Section 9(1)(vii) r.w.s. 44DA; 2% offshore profit attribution accepted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94813</link>
      <description>ITAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding taxation of the assessee&#039;s receipts under Section 44BB rather than as FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) r.w.s. 44DA, following judicial consistency with earlier years in the assessee&#039;s own case. On offshore sale of equipment, ITAT accepted the assessee&#039;s 2% profit attribution for Indian operations, relying on prior coordinate bench findings that the assessee&#039;s selected comparables satisfied FAR analysis and yielded a weighted average margin of 1.69%. Consequently, no further profit attribution was warranted and AO was directed to accept the 2% margin.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>