<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Imported multimedia speakers held classifiable under CTH 8518, not 8527 9100, nullifying MRP-based valuation, demands quashed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94809</link>
    <description>The CESTAT held that imported multimedia speakers with ancillary functions (USB/SD/MMC playback and/or FM radio) are correctly classifiable under CTH 8518. It found the classification issue no longer res integra, following consistent Tribunal and HC precedent. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s attempt to reclassify the goods under CTH 8527 9100 was rejected. As CTH 8518 does not attract MRP-based valuation, the basis for alleging non-declaration or suppression/reduction of MRP/RSP failed. The reclassification, demand of differential duty, and connected proceedings were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Imported multimedia speakers held classifiable under CTH 8518, not 8527 9100, nullifying MRP-based valuation, demands quashed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94809</link>
      <description>The CESTAT held that imported multimedia speakers with ancillary functions (USB/SD/MMC playback and/or FM radio) are correctly classifiable under CTH 8518. It found the classification issue no longer res integra, following consistent Tribunal and HC precedent. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s attempt to reclassify the goods under CTH 8527 9100 was rejected. As CTH 8518 does not attract MRP-based valuation, the basis for alleging non-declaration or suppression/reduction of MRP/RSP failed. The reclassification, demand of differential duty, and connected proceedings were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>