<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 445 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782905</link>
    <description>Cancellation of bail requires proof of breach of bail conditions or material showing that continued liberty would jeopardise the trial; on the facts, no such conclusive material was shown, so the request to cancel bail was rejected. A restrictive bail condition limiting the accused to Kolkata could be modified only on a substantial change in circumstances or a demonstrated unjustified restraint; as no fresh justification was established and the condition continued to support witness protection and trial integrity, modification was refused. Delay in presenting the modification application, being limited to filing and causing no shown prejudice, was condoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 445 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782905</link>
      <description>Cancellation of bail requires proof of breach of bail conditions or material showing that continued liberty would jeopardise the trial; on the facts, no such conclusive material was shown, so the request to cancel bail was rejected. A restrictive bail condition limiting the accused to Kolkata could be modified only on a substantial change in circumstances or a demonstrated unjustified restraint; as no fresh justification was established and the condition continued to support witness protection and trial integrity, modification was refused. Delay in presenting the modification application, being limited to filing and causing no shown prejudice, was condoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>