<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 446 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782906</link>
    <description>Nescafe Premix was held classifiable as coffee or instant coffee under the specific entry for coffee, because in common parlance and commercial understanding it was treated as such when prepared by adding hot water. Its composite ingredients, including soluble coffee powder, sucrose, milk powder and maltodextrin, did not change that character, and the percentage of coffee was not decisive for classification. The broader entry for powders from which non-alcoholic beverages are prepared could not apply where the goods fell within the specific coffee entry, since a specific description prevails over a general one. The product was therefore correctly classified under Entry C-II-3 and not Entry C-II-18(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 446 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782906</link>
      <description>Nescafe Premix was held classifiable as coffee or instant coffee under the specific entry for coffee, because in common parlance and commercial understanding it was treated as such when prepared by adding hot water. Its composite ingredients, including soluble coffee powder, sucrose, milk powder and maltodextrin, did not change that character, and the percentage of coffee was not decisive for classification. The broader entry for powders from which non-alcoholic beverages are prepared could not apply where the goods fell within the specific coffee entry, since a specific description prevails over a general one. The product was therefore correctly classified under Entry C-II-3 and not Entry C-II-18(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>