<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 453 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782913</link>
    <description>The CESTAT allowed the appeal filed by the service provider against service tax demand on services rendered to a SEZ unit. Relying on prior decisions, the Tribunal held that exemption benefits under Section 26 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 for taxable services provided to SEZ cannot be denied merely for procedural lapses or non-fulfilment of certain conditions prescribed in Notification No. 17/2011-ST, as amended. On merits, the impugned order confirming the demand was set aside and the exemption was granted. As the appeal was fully decided on merits in favour of the appellant, the Tribunal found it unnecessary to render any finding on limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:08:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 453 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782913</link>
      <description>The CESTAT allowed the appeal filed by the service provider against service tax demand on services rendered to a SEZ unit. Relying on prior decisions, the Tribunal held that exemption benefits under Section 26 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 for taxable services provided to SEZ cannot be denied merely for procedural lapses or non-fulfilment of certain conditions prescribed in Notification No. 17/2011-ST, as amended. On merits, the impugned order confirming the demand was set aside and the exemption was granted. As the appeal was fully decided on merits in favour of the appellant, the Tribunal found it unnecessary to render any finding on limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>