<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 459 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782919</link>
    <description>SC upheld SEBI&#039;s findings of insider trading and violation of the 2015 Regulations concerning non-disclosure and selective disclosure of unpublished price sensitive information. The Court accepted that there existed a statutory obligation to make such information generally available and an embargo against its misuse, and found the factual conclusions of SEBI and the Tribunal to be uncontroverted. Holding that the issues raised were predominantly factual and did not give rise to any substantial question of law, SC declined to interfere with the impugned orders, including the penalties imposed. The appeal filed by the anonymized appellant was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 459 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782919</link>
      <description>SC upheld SEBI&#039;s findings of insider trading and violation of the 2015 Regulations concerning non-disclosure and selective disclosure of unpublished price sensitive information. The Court accepted that there existed a statutory obligation to make such information generally available and an embargo against its misuse, and found the factual conclusions of SEBI and the Tribunal to be uncontroverted. Holding that the issues raised were predominantly factual and did not give rise to any substantial question of law, SC declined to interfere with the impugned orders, including the penalties imposed. The appeal filed by the anonymized appellant was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>