<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 487 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782947</link>
    <description>Section 234E late fee could not be levied through processing of TDS statements under Section 200A for the assessment years in question because the enabling provision under Section 200A was held to have come into force only from 01.06.2015. Following the jurisdictional High Court, the Tribunal treated the issue as no longer res integra and concluded that the adjustment made while processing those statements was not permissible. The levy was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 08:46:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 487 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782947</link>
      <description>Section 234E late fee could not be levied through processing of TDS statements under Section 200A for the assessment years in question because the enabling provision under Section 200A was held to have come into force only from 01.06.2015. Following the jurisdictional High Court, the Tribunal treated the issue as no longer res integra and concluded that the adjustment made while processing those statements was not permissible. The levy was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>