https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48466 Where sewing threads manufactured from duty-paid imported filaments or fibres were already covered by the exemption notifications and additional customs duty had been paid, a further excise demand as a second incidence of duty could not be sustained; the notices and consequential orders were set aside. The Court also held that the writ court was justified in entertaining the challenge despite an alternative appellate remedy, because the relevant legal position had been settled by the Supreme Court and prolonged pendency would make relegation to appeal futile. en-us Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48466 Where sewing threads manufactured from duty-paid imported filaments or fibres were already covered by the exemption notifications and additional customs duty had been paid, a further excise demand as a second incidence of duty could not be sustained; the notices and consequential orders were set aside. The Court also held that the writ court was justified in entertaining the challenge despite an alternative appellate remedy, because the relevant legal position had been settled by the Supreme Court and prolonged pendency would make relegation to appeal futile. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48466