<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 222 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48464</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the matter back to the tribunal with directions to pass a reasoned order considering the financial hardship factor of the petitioner. A stay was placed on further tax demands during the remand period or for one month, whichever is earlier. The impugned order was set aside, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly. The court also directed the authorities to communicate the order to the department without any costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 222 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48464</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the matter back to the tribunal with directions to pass a reasoned order considering the financial hardship factor of the petitioner. A stay was placed on further tax demands during the remand period or for one month, whichever is earlier. The impugned order was set aside, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly. The court also directed the authorities to communicate the order to the department without any costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>