https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465088 SC considered a challenge to HC's finding that the assessee had clandestinely manufactured and cleared substantial quantities of gutkha without payment of excise duty. The assessee contended that the finding was based merely on presumptions and assumptions and unsupported by tangible evidence of manufacture or removal. SC declined to interfere, holding that no substantial question of law arose warranting admission of the civil appeal. Finding no merit in the challenge to the HC's conclusions on clandestine removal and excise liability, SC refused admission and dismissed the appeal. en-us Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Dec 2025 19:11:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465088 SC considered a challenge to HC's finding that the assessee had clandestinely manufactured and cleared substantial quantities of gutkha without payment of excise duty. The assessee contended that the finding was based merely on presumptions and assumptions and unsupported by tangible evidence of manufacture or removal. SC declined to interfere, holding that no substantial question of law arose warranting admission of the civil appeal. Finding no merit in the challenge to the HC's conclusions on clandestine removal and excise liability, SC refused admission and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465088