<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1513 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465100</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding deletion of addition made u/s 68. The assessee had received money from sale of equity share investments held for more than a year, duly reflected in the audited financial statements of the preceding year. The Tribunal held that the impugned receipts were not unsecured loans or share capital/share premium but sale consideration from liquidation of earlier investments, whose source was never disputed. Consequently, section 68 was inapplicable, as no unexplained cash credits arose in the year under appeal. Finding no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning, the ITAT affirmed the deletion of the entire addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 15:18:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1513 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465100</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding deletion of addition made u/s 68. The assessee had received money from sale of equity share investments held for more than a year, duly reflected in the audited financial statements of the preceding year. The Tribunal held that the impugned receipts were not unsecured loans or share capital/share premium but sale consideration from liquidation of earlier investments, whose source was never disputed. Consequently, section 68 was inapplicable, as no unexplained cash credits arose in the year under appeal. Finding no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning, the ITAT affirmed the deletion of the entire addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>