<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 221 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48461</link>
    <description>Appeals originally filed within time and later withdrawn for settlement proceedings may be restored when the settlement route fails and the dispute has not been finally decided on merits. The court treated the later delay in returning to the Tribunal as not fatal, since the challenge to the order-in-original remained unresolved and the petitioners were entitled to pursue their appellate remedy in the interest of justice. Restoration was therefore permitted, subject to payment of costs as a condition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:14:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 221 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48461</link>
      <description>Appeals originally filed within time and later withdrawn for settlement proceedings may be restored when the settlement route fails and the dispute has not been finally decided on merits. The court treated the later delay in returning to the Tribunal as not fatal, since the challenge to the order-in-original remained unresolved and the petitioners were entitled to pursue their appellate remedy in the interest of justice. Restoration was therefore permitted, subject to payment of costs as a condition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>