https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465085 The Supreme Court declined to reopen its earlier judgment on entitlement to relief under Rule 57Q, finding no merit in the review petition. The earlier conclusion that the appellant was not entitled to relief under Rule 57Q was left undisturbed, and the original judgment dated 22-8-2001 remained intact. The decision confirms that the review route did not disclose any basis to alter the prior view on non-entitlement to the claimed excise relief. en-us Wed, 12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Dec 2025 18:36:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465085 The Supreme Court declined to reopen its earlier judgment on entitlement to relief under Rule 57Q, finding no merit in the review petition. The earlier conclusion that the appellant was not entitled to relief under Rule 57Q was left undisturbed, and the original judgment dated 22-8-2001 remained intact. The decision confirms that the review route did not disclose any basis to alter the prior view on non-entitlement to the claimed excise relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465085