<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 262 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48456</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the higher duty rate on imported goods due to a delay in berthing caused by a port strike. The Supreme Court directed sympathetic consideration by the Government but rejected the petitioner&#039;s subsequent representations seeking duty exemption. The Court emphasized the effective duty date as per the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment and held that it could not compel the Government to reconsider. The petition was dismissed in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on the duty calculation date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 262 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48456</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the higher duty rate on imported goods due to a delay in berthing caused by a port strike. The Supreme Court directed sympathetic consideration by the Government but rejected the petitioner&#039;s subsequent representations seeking duty exemption. The Court emphasized the effective duty date as per the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment and held that it could not compel the Government to reconsider. The petition was dismissed in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on the duty calculation date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>