https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48454 Discharge under Section 245 CrPC is justified only where the prosecution material, if unrebutted, would not disclose a prima facie case for conviction. The prosecution failed to secure seizure of the alleged property and produced no reliable evidence beyond a Customs Officer's testimony to show that the biscuit at the spot was gold, that the boxes contained smuggled gold, or that the accused were in possession of the property. The evidence also did not prima facie establish conspiracy or allied offences. On that material, the discharge was proper because no prima facie case was made out. en-us Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:04:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48454 Discharge under Section 245 CrPC is justified only where the prosecution material, if unrebutted, would not disclose a prima facie case for conviction. The prosecution failed to secure seizure of the alleged property and produced no reliable evidence beyond a Customs Officer's testimony to show that the biscuit at the spot was gold, that the boxes contained smuggled gold, or that the accused were in possession of the property. The evidence also did not prima facie establish conspiracy or allied offences. On that material, the discharge was proper because no prima facie case was made out. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48454