<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 108 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48453</link>
    <description>The court held that the vessel did not discharge the full manifested quantity of acid grade flourspar at the port of Cuddalore due to the invalidity of the draft survey report. A penalty for short landing was imposed under the Customs Act, which was upheld despite delays in filing the revision application. The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the penalty imposed by the Customs Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 108 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48453</link>
      <description>The court held that the vessel did not discharge the full manifested quantity of acid grade flourspar at the port of Cuddalore due to the invalidity of the draft survey report. A penalty for short landing was imposed under the Customs Act, which was upheld despite delays in filing the revision application. The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the penalty imposed by the Customs Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>